← All projects01 / 04 · Poly UAS · Project Lead

Munnin

Modular unmanned aircraft system

Project Lead · Systems Integration · Mechanical Design

I lead Munnin’s development across airframe, propulsion, avionics, communications, and compute. My detailed mechanical work includes the main body, top plate, motor mounts, landing gear, and battery retention. I coordinate subsystem interfaces as the team brings the aircraft into its initial hardware build.

Initial hardware build · 2026–present

  • PAHT-CF
  • Folding structure
  • Avionics integration
Munnin full-aircraft assembly · Flight configuration.
Munnin full-aircraft assembly · Flight configuration.

01 / Airframe architecture

Structures and interfaces

I structured the airframe around a printed main body, carbon-fiber arm assemblies, and replaceable external parts. The body connects the arm interfaces, protected avionics volume, top plate, and landing-gear inserts. The design packages a 22-inch propeller envelope around a printed central structure.

Munnin subsystem interfaces. Navigation and compute are design selections; integration and flight verification are in progress.
Munnin subsystem interfaces. Navigation and compute are design selections; integration and flight verification are in progress.
Earlier central-body geometry showing arm sockets, the avionics cavity, and internal reinforcement interfaces.
Earlier central-body geometry showing arm sockets, the avionics cavity, and internal reinforcement interfaces.
01

Central body

A single PAHT-CF print carries the arm interfaces and provides a protected cavity for electronics. Internal tray and stiffener interfaces connect packaging requirements to the body geometry.

02

Folding arms

The aircraft progressed from plug-in, removable arms to the folding configuration shown in the hardware below. Lock stiffness, retention, and folded clearance are the relevant interface checks.

03

Replaceable external parts

I designed the motor mounts and landing-gear inserts as separate, replaceable parts. The mounts connect propulsion loads to the carbon-fiber arms. The gear insert is intended to absorb damage before the main body during a hard landing.

Initial hardware assembly with the arms extended.
Initial hardware assembly with the arms extended.
The same aircraft folded for transport.
The same aircraft folded for transport.
Earlier retention architecture and folded-envelope drawing
Earlier aircraft CAD retained to show the progression toward the current full assembly.
Earlier aircraft CAD retained to show the progression toward the current full assembly.

The earlier removable-arm design used a plug-in socket and M3 thumb-screw retention with axial preload. The folding revision changes that interface; earlier retention geometry should not be read as the final folding lock.

Folded configuration drawing supplied with the current build photographs.
Folded configuration drawing supplied with the current build photographs.

02 / Materials & manufacturing

Printed geometry with serviceable joints

The design uses PAHT-CF printed structural parts and carbon-fiber tubing. Manufacturing and replacement are considered at the interface level, rather than treating the frame as one disposable assembly.

PAHT-CF printing
The documented process uses a 0.8 mm nozzle. Arm sockets, the central cavity, and reinforcement interfaces are integrated into the main-body print.
Carbon-fiber tubes
Tube interfaces transfer propulsion and landing loads into the printed parts. The landing insert removes the need for an angled tube cut at that joint.
Assembly strategy
The top plate, motor mounts, battery-retention parts, and landing inserts are distinct components. Access and replacement can be addressed without reprinting the main body.

03 / Electronics & avionics

Packaging the complete system

As project lead, I specify individual components against propulsion, compute, communications, power, and physical-interface requirements. The flight controller, companion compute, and navigation hardware must fit the protected center volume alongside their connections.

Avionics packaging in an earlier CAD configuration. This image illustrates physical arrangement, not a final installed bill of materials.
Avionics packaging in an earlier CAD configuration. This image illustrates physical arrangement, not a final installed bill of materials.

Power and signal separation

High-current motor and ESC paths are considered separately from low-level avionics signals. Central placement, harness access, and shielding interfaces guide the layout; EMI performance remains a verification task.

Flight & navigation
Flight controller · Dual-antenna RTK / UM982 design target
Compute & communications
Companion processing · Radio integration
Propulsion & power
Battery · Distribution · ESC / motor connections

Dual-antenna GNSS heading is a navigation design target. Companion-compute packaging must leave access for connections and heat removal; the pack enclosure includes vent openings. Thermal behavior and EMI separation still require installed-system checks.

Tray, shielding plate, and stiffener

The internal mounting surface locates the avionics tray and shielding plate. The stiffener is intended to limit local deformation around the cavity. The documented FEA covers the main body only, so it does not establish tray or stiffener performance.

Internal tray and stiffener geometry from the earlier design review.
Internal tray and stiffener geometry from the earlier design review.

04 / Power system

Battery packaging and retention

Munnin uses the same 6S4P, 21700-cell battery design used for Osiris, with 24 cells packaged inside a split enclosure. I designed the retention system alongside the body and top plate, with access to the pack and its mating connectors treated as mechanical requirements.

Design configuration6S4P
Cells modeled24
Power interfaceXT90NE-F
NEWBATASSEM: vented split enclosure with accessible connector faces.
NEWBATASSEM: vented split enclosure with accessible connector faces.
Case halves hidden to expose the cell envelope, door components, and connector placement.
Case halves hidden to expose the cell envelope, door components, and connector placement.

Enclosure

Separate left/right case and door components enclose the cells. Openings are included in the exterior geometry.

Retention

A spring latch and two compression springs form part of the updated assembly.

Connector access

The XT90NE-F panel-mounted power connector and separate JST-XH6-SMD connector are located at the end of the pack.

CAD reviewed in Battery → NEWBATASSEM on October 27, 2026. Electrical interconnects, latch capacity, and cooling performance are not established by these views.

05 / Structural engineering

Main-body inertial-relief analysis

Preliminary SolidWorks FEA applies thrust and bending demand directly at the four arm interfaces. Inertial relief represents a free-flying body rather than a body held at a fixed structural boundary.

Thrust per arm58.8 N
Moment per arm17.9 N·m
Reported peak nodal stress21.95 MPa
Original main-body stress contour. The reported maximum is 2.195 × 10⁷ Pa (21.95 MPa) for the documented preliminary load case.
Original main-body stress contour. The reported maximum is 2.195 × 10⁷ Pa (21.95 MPa) for the documented preliminary load case.

Load application

Per-arm thrust: 6 kgf × 9.80665 ≈ 58.8 N.
Bending demand: 58.8 N × 0.3048 m ≈ 17.9 N·m.
The equivalent motor moment arm is 12 inches.

Analysis boundary

Only the main body is covered. Battery and payload inertia, printed-material directionality, deflection acceptance, and hardware correlation remain necessary before using the result for final structural acceptance.

Load setup and material-definition assumptions
Documented arm-interface loading in the preliminary SolidWorks model.
Documented arm-interface loading in the preliminary SolidWorks model.

The review lists an elastic modulus of 4.29 GPa, Poisson’s ratio of 0.35, and density of 1060 kg/m³. Its material definition includes 100 MPa tensile/compressive values and 50 MPa yield. These are model inputs transcribed in the design review, not experimentally established printed-part allowables.

Material-definition screenshot retained with the analysis source.
Material-definition screenshot retained with the analysis source.

06 / Hardware status

Initial build

Physical assemblies are shown folded and extended. I coordinate fit, retention, harness access, and folding-interface checks as the team integrates the initial hardware.

Built evidence
Initial airframe hardware and the folded/extended configurations shown above.
Design evidence
Current battery CAD, earlier avionics packaging, and the documented preliminary main-body FEA.
Next verification
Installed-system checks, folding-lock behavior, landing-insert response, and structural correlation. Flight capability is not claimed from the CAD or FEA.

07 / Team apparel

Munnin shirt concept

The artwork combines the aircraft’s extended and folded views with a technical specification layout. The displayed performance figures are design goals, including a 60-minute flight-time goal.

Team-shirt concept. Performance specifications are goals, not measured aircraft results; flight-time goal: 60 minutes.
Team-shirt concept. Performance specifications are goals, not measured aircraft results; flight-time goal: 60 minutes.
Before production

Production status

Shirts will be produced after aircraft performance has been measured and the printed specifications have been finalized. The rendering shows the proposed artwork.

Continue exploringOsiris All projects